Friday, July 5, 2024

July 5– “The Story Told by the Tailor” from "1001 Nights"

Barbering!

July 5– “The Story Told by the Tailor” from 1001 Nights

Summary: A barber talks so much a guy breaks his leg trying to escape him.

Commentary: I was a little wary about another 1000 Nights. I liked the first couple, but the last couple haven't been as good. This one was better. Funny. It reminds me of a time my dad was upset because he found a new barber much closer than his old one, but got upset since the new one talked so much it took longer to drive there and get his hair cut than to drive to the older further away one.

Thursday, July 4, 2024

Reflections on Week 26 (June 24-30)

   Link to readings

It's nice to be home.

Quick review on this week's readings:

June 24 "The Story Told by the Christian Broker" from 1001 Nights: 1/5 I really liked the first couple 1000 Nights selection, but they've gotten kind of boring and repetitive. I'd probably have whacked off her head by now.

June 25 Poems by Robert Herrick: 3/5 Not the most creative poetry, but it knows what it is and it gets on with it.

June 26 Beowulf : 2.5/5 Beowulf in T5FSOB? Yes. Beowulf in the reading guide? Yes. This section of Beowulf in the reading guide? Ehhhhh.

June 27 "Of Friendship" by Bacon: 3/5 Much like the Herrick poems, this isn't terribly profound, but it is effective.

June 28 The Voyage of The Beagle by Darwin: 3/5 Darwin screws up hunting, and it's pretty funny. Not quite as informative as some other sections.

June 29 Macbeth by Shakespeare: 2/5 I gave the Beowulf section a pass. This one is just a bad choice

June 30 "On Liberty" John Stuart Mill : 4/5 It's nice to read a "tyranny of the majority" essay that isn't just whining by a guy who would thinks it should be legal to own people.

Average: 2.6/5 A week that broadly improved as it went on.

Overall Thoughts on The Project:

I feel similarly to Herrick as I do about Rosseau from a few weeks ago. He's not the most profound poet (a decent Shakespeare sonnet is certainly better than anything in this sample), but he's very readable, and its clear what he's trying to do in his writing. I think he'd be a great middle ground between "silly kid poems" like "The Itsy Bitsy Spider" and "serious adult poems" that would help people be able to better read and understand poetry.

I've both Beowulf and Macbeth the last couple years. What the heck is going on with those selections? Beowulf, at least we got a major scene. Not one I'd have picked, but it's a major scene. But who goes, "You know what I love about Macbeth? The dinner!" You've got to be a theatre/Shakespeare nerd to even know that one exists.

Mill is great. I'm really looking forward to digging into his stuff in general once I get some time.

July 4– The Declaration of Independence (1776)

 Old School / New School

July 4– The Declaration of Independence (1776)

Summary: No more colonies.

Commentary: Let's do a longish pull quote today:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

 While we have always been entirely successful in living up to those ideals as a nation, I think that this paragraph, more or less, sums up the goals of any politician, law, etc. of a functional liberal/democratic government.

 all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That's the point of the whole thing. If you're not doing this, you're not doing liberty, democracy, etc. at all.

 Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

It's interesting to think about the spectrum from "soap box to ammo box" as the saying goes. How much do things have to be wrong before it's worthwhile to go and riot, storm Congress, etc.? Especially in a democracy where people can have conflicting views, but aren't necessarily wrong (or where both can be right and wrong in different ways).

I think, overall, if we keep those ideals in the beginning of the paragraph in mind, we'll most avoid the second half of the paragraph and mostly do the right thing. Mistakes happen, but strongly held principles are the best way to guide ourselves on a good path. And, while the examples in this paragraph are great, you need to be able to define your own values for it to really matter.

Wednesday, July 3, 2024

July 3– From "The Battle of Gettysburg" (1898) by Frank Aretas HI askell

 Cyclorama!

July 3– From The Battle of Gettysburg (1898) by Frank Aretas Haskell

Summary: How do you summarize Gettysburg? A lot of men died, and the Union won, I guess.

Commentary: I had another selection for this book, "American Historical Documents" a week or so ago. I don't think that label really applies (maybe First Hand Accounts of History instead). If we didn't have AN ENTIRE VOLUME OF BURRRRNNNNSSSS Elliot could've put in a few more historical documents (maybe expanding it to the rest of the world) and then had a whole book of accounts also, rather than smooshing them awkwardly in one.

I don't have a ton to say about the particular entry. Decent enough writing. Reasonably significant topic. Solid 3 on the rating scale.

Tuesday, July 2, 2024

July 2– From "Plutarch’s Lives: Caesar" translated by Dryden and edited by A. H. Clough

I love this guy's outfit

July 2– From Plutarch’s Lives: Caesar translated by Dryden and edited by A. H. Clough

Summary: Caesar changed the calendar and got assassinated.

Commentary: We already got a Caesar reading back in March. The summary for today is all about him changing the calendar, but we only got like one paragraph of that. Kind of disappointing, I thought a reading about calendar math/history might be interesting. The current (Georgian) calendar is a very minor revision to the Julian calendar, built around standardizing leap years. It's an improvement, but only in about the smallest possible way. People have come up with so many better calendar systems since then, and we haven't used any of them. My favorite is Symetry454, which:

1. Is perpetual (the minimum improvement for any new calendar we should consider): All days are the same day of the week every year e.g. January 1st is always Monday, July 2nd is always Tuesday.

2. All same numbered days are on the same day of the week month to month. The 1st is always a Monday, the 18th is always a Thursday, etc.

3. All holidays are now fixed. While the goofy "Xth Thursday after Y" construction is kind of fun, it's not very practical.

4. Aligns most or all major civil and religious holidays, keeps a traditional sabbath cycle, and avoids Friday the 13th, accommodating a variety of superstitions that a lot of other alternate calendars ignore.

5. No non-calendar days (many alternate proposals add in a weird day somewhere that doesn't have a real date and make you call it sprok day or something).

6. Evenly divisible weeks, months, and quarters. Always starting on Monda7y and ending on Sunday.

I don't love the Leap Year implementation, but I don't know that there are any calendars that I do, between overly complicated (every 4 years, but not 100s, except 400s) or (as above) involve adding weird semi-days.

From the site linked:

It is a leap year only if the remainder of ( 52 × Year + 146 ) / 293 is less than 52.

That's not very hard math (it looks like a lot, but it's nothing you couldn't work out on pencil and paper in grade school), but I don't love that it works out to sometimes 5 years between leaps and sometimes 6.

We get a whole leap week instead of a leap day. Again, that sounds like a lot, but it keeps things more regular (making one of the 4 week months into a 5 prevents breaking anything).

Monday, July 1, 2024

July 1– From "The Origin of Species" (1859) by Charles Darwin

 Evolution

July 1– From The Origin of Species (1859) by Charles Darwin

Summary:

Commentary: For the first time (and somewhat bizarrely) this one starts with T5FSOB introduction, then proceeds with a "pre-introduction" from the actual book summarizing the study of evolution. Apologies for any typos in the initial section, I don't have any clean/easily copyable copies of T5FSOB itself, just pdfs that're readable, but not perfect. 

I think the weirdest thing about the study of evolution (and this is obviously grossly oversimplifying) is that it should be pretty clearly evident that it can/does happen. We've been breeding working animals for desired traits thousands of years ago, and the same with fruit. I guess it's a bit of a stretch to imagine that something could evolve into both an elephant and a mouse, but it makes sense if you think about the billion things that branch in between them. The Aristotle quote in the beginning more or less illustrates this. I don't often nod along with Aristotle, but we're good here.

It doesn't even necessarily rule out some kind of divine intervention. A deity could make a bunch of living things however long ago, and over time they grow and change. A variant of this is mentioned by several of the quoted writers in the text.

Darwin leaves a lot of untranslated foreign text (mostly French) here. I'm really grateful for machine translation, since they're far too long for me to try to force my way through with a dictionary. Although it would be a good excuse to find someone to collaborate and help translate otherwise.

July 5– “The Story Told by the Tailor” from "1001 Nights"

Barbering! July 5– “The Story Told by the Tailor” from 1001 Nights Summary: A barber talks so much a guy breaks his leg trying to escape him...