Monday, April 14, 2025

L is for Law and Life and Death: "The Killers" by Ernest Hemmingway

 2-169

I saw this selection showed up in two of tonight's words, and that seemed like a good enough excuse to read some more Hemmingway.

Other L Ideas:  Labor, Language, Liberty, Logic, and Love

Summary: Two killers walk into a bar diner.

Bonus: Definitely taking the easy way out tonight.

Commentary: I did not realize this was going to be a Nick Adams story, and that was a fun little surprise. I think the highlight here for me is the dialogue between the titular killers, Max and Al. They sound just like a couple of assholes would today. "Your boyfriend", "bright boy", "girl friends", etc. Kind of a short selection, and not one I have a ton to say about. (I'll refrain from adding to the piles of scholarship on Hemmingway and the n-word tonight.) 2/5

I'm thankful for being alive, so I can do fun still like go to the botanical gardens.

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Bonus Sunday 2: "(A) Proposal(s) for/to Promoting Useful Knowledge among the British Plantations in America and Relating to the Education of Youth in Pennsylvania" by Benjamin Franklin

 6-533 (Knowledge) and 536 (History)

A pair of Ben Franklin readings that're pretty short, even when combined.

Summary: Ben Franklin makes plans to form an academic Justice League and an academy of learning.

Bonus: Surprisingly, I can't find a video of "Liberal Arts Majors, Assemble!" or "By Your Powers Combined, I'm The Sciences!" or anything like that. So have some Big O (the dub's better.)


Commentary: My favorite part of the first selection (Ben Franklin creates a league of scientists in the colonies) is that he spends half of it arranging to use things that he's in charge of. "By permission of the Postmaster General." That's you, Ben Franklin. Likewise, putting the society in Philly in part because of the good library. Also you, Ben Franklin. 

From the second selection, about starting an academy, I learned that "countenance" can mean "support", as well as "face". Please make use of this in your hoighty-toighty fantasy contracts. "The Spirits of Skullkeep shall countenance the Magus when summoned."

He wants the academy to help students find marriages after graduation. Better get some personals sections going in those alumni mags. 

Beyond that, it's a reasonable if somewhat standard classical curriculum. He traces through the triv and quad, adds a few new things (gotta have that French), but there's little that hasn't been in any of the other readings on education I've featured. Total review: 2/5

Saturday, April 12, 2025

K is for Knowledge: The Will to Believe by William James

 10-39

No other K words!

Summary: There are many different types of belief.

Bonus: Lots of Gurren Lagann this month. I think I've posted this before.



Commentary: This is mostly about classifying different types of beliefs and hypothesis. Is it significant or minor, is it mandatory or avoidable (eg, if I ask if you want a raincoat when you go outside, you could choose yes, no, or not go outside), knowable or not.

I think the most interesting is "dead" vs "alive" a live hypothesis is one where both possibilities seem plausible to you. For example, I could believe both that I'll catch 10 fish tomorrow or none. I don't think it's plausible that I'll catch a rhino. 

Rating: 2/5. This is a nice meaty philosophy text, probably well worth it if you're into that sort of thing. If I liked philosophy more, I think I'd have enjoyed it. As is, it's a little dense/in the weeds for me. 

Friday, April 11, 2025

J is for Justice: "On World Government" by Dante Alighieri

 7-383

Other J idea: Judgement (kind of similar) 

Summary: God/Aristotle (same dif) says you need an Emperor

Bonus: (Why don't I ever embed these?) My preferred form of world government:



Commentary: Interestingly, after the other day's reading, Dante thinks it's pointless to try to teach people to be happy, since Aristotle already did it perfectly (Plutarch lived ~500 years after Aristotle). 

Dante is very convinced that all civilizations should share the same main goal(s). This seems pretty questionable to me, but I was prepared to let him argue it out. He says that goal (borrowed from Aristotle) is "the ability to grow in intelligence." I certainly think that's a good goal (gestures towards blog), but I don't know that it's the ultimate end all-be-all of all civilization. If anything, it seems more like a goal that could be used to lead to other goals (better health, happiness, etc.) It might be a useful "metagoal" for accomplishing these things, but making it the prime-goal feels backwards to me. 

His best route to this goal is universal peace. That seems reasonable enough. I guess you can make the "we discovered a lot of useful stuff via war" argument, but I think it's a stretch to say war is necessary (or even the most efficient) way to advance knowledge. 

This is his basic reasoning for the need for world government. And, to be very clear, this is explicitly a top down "monarch or emperor" government. No world democratic council shenanigans here. (There are legislators in there somewhere, though.) State, local, etc. governments do remain intact, they just get very little say in things that aren't directly under them. 

There's a lot of "obviously this is true" or "just read THE PHILOSOPHER (Aristotle)" across this whole essay, and not a lot of actual proving. (In addition to a bunch of "God wants world government.)

As someone who is broadly supportive of a more active world (or at least super-national) government, this essay is, if anything, making me support it less. He never really proves anything, just goes "Obviously a universal government will be the most just/freeing/etc. and then appeals to "purity"(mixing governments makes the impure!) and God. Broadly, I support what I call "hourglass government". Power should be concentrated locally (as the most directly affected by issues) and at the highest possible level (as the one with the broadest base of experience and resources) everything in between is just middle management to connect the two and should be minimized.

Rating: 1/5. I'm not offended, it's just bad. Dante is a proto-facist?

Thursday, April 10, 2025

I is for Infinity: "Definition of a Number" by Bertrand Russel

 9-111

Other I Ideas: Idea, Immortality, Induction

Summary: A number is a number which is the same as the other numbers that are the same number as it.

Bonus: Marvel Vs Capcom 2 is silly

Commentary: This is largely a review of your middle school math vocabulary (domain, set, etc.) He does eventually get to what he claims is the definition of number:

"A number is anything which is the number of some class."

Russel admits this is somewhat circular, but attempts to justify it by explaining that you can't define "the class of fathers" without first defining father. Of course, he's doing the opposite here. He manages to sort of define "classes of numbers" as "The number of a class is the class of all those classes that are similar to it." The similar is making this a real fuzzy definition, but it's not completely circular. But you need to define number to define "class of number" not the other way around (just as you use father to define "class of father" not "class of father" to define father.)

For the sake of the blog, I looked up number in a couple different dictionaries (I even drug down the N volume of our encyclopedia). I think my favorite comes from wiktionary:  An abstract entity used to describe quantity.

0/5 Pointless.

I'm grateful for the infinite combinations of words that I can read and write.

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

H is for Happiness: "Contentment by Plutarch" (Translated by Moses Hadas)

 10-264

Other H words: Habit, History, Honor, Hypothesis

Summary: Do the things that make your life better.

Bonus: It's time for bed, this video might go with the reading, whatever. Top 1 Anime Deaths.

Commentary: I could really use more contentment in my life, so I went with this for tonight. Might go fishing this weekend, that's a good contentment activity.

I have put together notes on contentment which I had made for my own use, in the conviction that what you desired was not a polished literary composition but something that would be serviceable and helpful.

I feel like this is a very contentmentful was of writing. 

Next time someone makes fun of you for rehearsing your argument in your head, tell them Xenophon and Plutarch recommend it:

It is the same with arguments which are specifics for the passions: sensible people should rehearse them before the passions arise to have them in stock for greater effectiveness.  

His first major tip for contentment is to go do stuff. Specifically, good stuff. 

Timorous and seasick voyagers imagine their plight would be eased if they transferred from a sloop to a merchantman and then from a merchantman to a warship; but their efforts are futile because they carry their bile and their squeamishness with them.

I love everything about this.

Plato likened life to a game of dice, where we must make an advantageous throw, and then make proper use of whatever falls. The first of these, the advantageous throw, is not in our discretion; but to receive what fate allots properly, to assign each item a place where what we like will do most good and what we dislike least harm—that is our function if we are wise. Men who approach life without craftsmanship and intelligence are like sick people who can tolerate neither heat nor cold; prosperity elates them and adversity dejects them. They are perturbed by either lot, or rather by themselves in either lot, and no less in so-called prosperity than in the other. 

At this point, I'm just gonna quote this whole piece. I like a lot of things about this:

1. It acknowledges the role (roll!) of things outside our control in the quality of our lives. (Later identified as a small part, also good.)

2. It frames making the best of what life gives us as a responsibility.

3. I like the use of "craftmanship" here. Being a good craftsman in any regard is underrated. It's become almost an insult in some cases.

4. People who are upset about everything are usually actually upset about themselves.

"Well done, Fortune! You have driven me to Stoicism.” That's a T-shirt.

Honestly, I could quote about half this piece. It's great. It says all the same things optimistic platitudes say, but backs them up with reasoning. 5/5, must read for anyone. First one for this challenge, and only the 3rd or 4th overall.    

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

G is for God: "What Men Live By" by Leo Tolstoy (translated by Nathan Haskell Dole)

 3-707

Other G words: Good and Evil and Government

Summary: An angel is banished to Earth to learn about love. It's like It's a Wonderful Life: Silver Age Thor Edition

Bonus: Final Fantasy VII is peak MIDI.

Commentary: I picked this one out a while ago, and I'm a little surprised I picked God for my G word. I'm guessing I just did it as an excuse to read Tolstoy. 

First impressions: Wow, that's a lot of epigraph! 

I like the cobbler almost giving the guy his hat, but then changing his mind since he's bald and the guy has hair. 

The ending is really the most interesting part. It starts out in the OT "God is a dick, hurray!" mode that I spent so much time complaining about last year, but veers into a more NT "Love each other" lane. It's interesting to see the two (often separate) aspects blended in one story. Classics grade 2/5: Worth reading, but not required.

I'm thankful for finally having an excuse to read some Tolstoy. Now I can be even more of an insufferable hipster. 

Bacon's Essays 17 (Superstition)

 Bacon's Essays 17 (Superstition) Bonus:  Kinda lazy tonight. Summary:  Superstition is even worse than Atheism, since it leads to follo...